Argentine Probe Keeps Milei In Focus After LIBRA Phone Call Report Details Emerge

TLDR

• NYT said Milei had seven calls with a key LIBRA project figure.
• The calls came around the time Milei publicly backed the token.
• LIBRA later collapsed and the project moved into scandal.
• Milei has “denied wrongdoing” in the ongoing case.
• Investigators still view Milei as a “person of interest.”

Argentina’s President Javier Milei is under renewed scrutiny after a fresh report on the LIBRA crypto project. The New York Times said he had seven phone calls with a key figure behind the project. The calls happened around the time he posted public support for the token.

LIBRA later collapsed and became the center of a public scandal in Argentina. Milei has “denied wrongdoing” in the matter and in related public scrutiny. Still, investigators continue to view him as a “person of interest” in the case.

Report puts timing of calls in focus

The New York Times reported that Milei spoke seven times with a key LIBRA figure. The calls came before and after his public message backing the token online. That timing drew attention because the post helped promote LIBRA to a wider audience. The report placed those contacts close to a key public moment for the project.

The shared summary did not describe the content or purpose of the calls. However, repeated contact became a central part of the story and the inquiry. It raised questions about what Milei knew and when he knew those details. It also kept focus on his public role during the project’s rise and collapse.

NYT: Milei had 7 calls with LIBRA-linked entrepreneur on launch night

New evidence in Argentina’s LIBRA scandal shows President Javier Milei had seven phone calls with entrepreneur Mauricio Novelli on the night the token launched in 2025, according to federal investigation… pic.twitter.com/ixh2dTytC0

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) April 6, 2026

LIBRA later collapsed, and the project moved from hype to scandal very quickly. After that, earlier contacts became part of a wider inquiry into the project’s timeline. Investigators are reviewing records, timelines, call data, and the order of events. The report placed Milei’s calls inside that broader timeline now under review.

Milei denies wrongdoing as inquiry stays open

Milei has denied wrongdoing in the LIBRA case since questions first surfaced. The report said he remains a “person of interest” in the investigation. That label does not, by itself, mean formal charges or a finding of guilt. It means investigators still want to examine his conduct and his contacts.

The shared summary did not mention any court ruling or charge against Milei. It also did not say the calls alone proved unlawful conduct. Even so, investigators appear to see the contacts as relevant to their review. That keeps the president linked to the case as the inquiry continues.

The issue has stayed active because Milei leads Argentina and speaks to large audiences. His office and public statements carry added weight in financial and political debates. Because of that, any contact with project leaders draws closer review from investigators. That is why phone records matter so much in this developing story.

LIBRA collapse keeps attention on political links

LIBRA gained wider notice after Milei publicly supported the token on social media. That support helped bring the project to a broader audience in Argentina and beyond. After the collapse, scrutiny widened across the people tied to the LIBRA project. The latest report adds new detail about those links and their timing.

For crypto readers, the timing of public messages often matters a great deal. A post from a president can affect visibility, interest, and market behavior. Private contact near that period can then draw added scrutiny from authorities. That remains the central angle of the latest report about Milei and LIBRA.

The case now turns on records, timelines, and verified communication between people involved. The New York Times added seven calls to that growing public record. Milei continues to reject wrongdoing, and the investigation is still active. For now, the focus remains on his contact with a LIBRA project leader.