TLDR
- Charles Hoskinson denied claims that Midnight’s bridge would permanently operate as a one-way channel.
- He said the tokenomics paper outlines phased development that includes a future two-way bridge.
- Bliss Pool stated that the document initially describes the bridge as one-way.
- Community members raised concerns about liquidity moving from Cardano into Midnight.
- Cardano DRep dori defended Midnight and described it as a partner chain focused on privacy.
Charles Hoskinson responded to renewed criticism over the Midnight bridge design and rejected claims that it harms Cardano. He addressed concerns raised by Stake Pool operator Bliss Pool on X and denied any plan to trap liquidity. Meanwhile, the debate resurfaced as Midnight secured a listing on the Australian exchange CoinSpot.
Midnight Bridge Design Sparks Debate
Hoskinson pushed back against claims that Midnight would permanently operate a one-way bridge. He said critics misread the tokenomics paper and misrepresented its phased bridge plan.
He stated that Midnight does not permanently block assets from returning to Cardano. He explained that the document outlines different stages, including a future two-way bridge.
For the third time now because people are purposely moving the goal post, The implication was not we would start with a one-way bridge. The implication was there would only ever be a one-way bridge and this was done as a business decision to harm Cardano. It was then used as…
— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) April 6, 2026
Bliss Pool pointed to language in the tokenomics paper referencing a one-way bridge. The operator said it remains technically correct that the bridge begins as one-way.
Community members argued that a one-way structure could lock assets inside Midnight. They warned that such a setup could shift liquidity away from Cardano.
Hoskinson rejected claims that he and the IOG team chose to harm Cardano. He said critics framed a temporary design feature as a permanent policy.
He said, “There is no intention to harm Cardano.” He also said critics twist facts to support their narrative.
Cardano Community Responds to Midnight Rollout
The debate intensified after Cardano DRep dori defended Midnight over the weekend. Dori said Midnight does not compete with Cardano but supports it.
Dori described Midnight as a partner chain focused on privacy features. Dori said it fills a privacy gap in the blockchain sector.
He added that Hoskinson showed foresight by investing in privacy infrastructure early. He stated that other networks are only now moving toward similar solutions.
Community critics continued to question the bridge structure and liquidity flow. They stressed the need for transparency in project communication.
Hoskinson maintained that the tokenomics paper clearly explains the phased bridge model. He said the paper includes references to a later two-way bridge.
He criticized efforts to portray the early one-way phase as a fixed outcome. He insisted that the design evolves.
Midnight gained further traction after CoinSpot listed the token for Australian users. The exchange confirmed that traders can access Midnight and use its privacy features.
The listing expands Midnight’s availability in the Australian market. CoinSpot users can now trade the token directly on the platform.
✨ Limited Time Offer
Get 3 Free Stock Ebooks
Discover top-performing stocks in AI, Crypto, and Technology with expert analysis.
-
Top 10 AI Stocks – Leading AI companies -
Top 10 Crypto Stocks – Blockchain leaders -
Top 10 Tech Stocks – Tech giants















